Suman Sahai
All technologies but especially those related to food and
agriculture must be adopted in developing countries only if small farmers and
rural communities can benefit from them.
It is important to recognize that there are many indigenous
technologies and knowledge systems that work well for rural communities because
they are affordable, accessible and communities are skilled in their use. New
technologies must neither displace nor diminish such indigenous technologies.
A new agricultural technology must have a strong local
context to be meaningful and the agenda must be determined by local
stakeholders. The research goals must be determined by the needs of local
agriculture, not imported as a package as is the case currently with Bt and
Herbicide Tolerant (HT) crops. A
technology developed for industrial agriculture is unlikely to work for
resource poor farmers in developing countries because it is usually more
expensive, it can be irrelevant or even harmful
and it is alien in its application.
Growing Bt cotton which is expensive and has complex
requirements of maintaining non Bt refuges and counting insects to determine
when an insecticide spray is required, places great financial burdens and
provides opportunities for things going wrong.
HT crops constitute a labor saving technology, which is absolutely wrong
for labor surplus developing countries where agricultural operations like
weeding, threshing and winnowing provide much needed wages to agriculture
labor. In addition, weeds that would be destroyed by herbicide application
serve as leafy green vegetables for the family, fodder for livestock and
medicinal plants for health and veterinary care in rural areas.
The adoption of regulated technologies like Ag biotechnology
may not be difficult where regulatory systems can be established and enforced
easily. This is not necessarily the case in developing countries where there is
a deficit of skilled manpower and finances to run a stringent regulatory
system. In the absence of a technically competent, transparent and accountable
regulatory system, adoption of Ag biotechnology which has
environmental, health and socio-economic implications is not advisable in poor
countries.
To develop new technologies relevant to the poor, the public
sector must step up spending to create accessible and affordable public goods.
International research and development agencies must support such efforts and
intervene in the creation of novel approaches to deal with innovation and
intellectual property (IP) so that new technologies do not remain shackled in
patents, available only to the rich. Countries should develop sensible domestic
IP policies incorporating equity and justice.
No comments:
Post a Comment