Sukhpal Singh/ Suman Sahai
A sum of Rs1,000 crore sounds good if instead of large irrigation projects and canal networks, the money is used largely for decentralised (rainwater) conservation and storage.
Leaving aside a focus on warehousing and farm
credit, the Budget has sprayed Rs 100 crore across a clutter of schemes
The new government’s budget is marked
by a fractured approach to the farm sector, where perhaps the most significant
spend has been on irrigation, after the large allocation to farm credit.
Credit push
A sum of Rs1,000 crore sounds good if instead of large irrigation projects and canal networks, the money is used largely for decentralised (rainwater) conservation and storage.
Agriculture in rainfed areas, plateau
regions and mountain ecologies could get a boost if a network of tanks, ponds,
wells, check dams is established along with efficient lift irrigation schemes
for protective irrigation.
The new project “Neeranchal” to give
impetus to watershed development in the country with an initial outlay of Rs.
2,142 crore is welcome. However, micro irrigation which is a relative success
in Gujarat and is part of its agri development
model, unlike other states, surprisingly finds no mention in the Budget.
There are also a number of small sum
token schemes now known as the Rs.100 crore schemes’..
However, a significant increase in
farm credit from Rs. 7 lakh crore to Rs. 8 lakh crore is a desirable move given
the extreme paucity of formal credit to farmers.
But this money should not go
overwhelmingly to high end agriculture/agribusiness to support cold chains,
warehouses, reefer trucks, high tech packaging etc. Significant portions of the
credit portfolio must be made available to enable small and marginal farmers to
become not just self-sufficient, but also entrepreneurial.
An important provision is the Long
Term Rural Credit Fund set up for the purpose of providing refinance support to
Cooperative Banks and Regional Rural Banks with an initial corpus of Rs. 5,000
crore.
These banks were being marginalized in
the rural and farm credit sector resulting in the exclusion of marginal and
small farmers in the last decade.
Another amount of Rs 50,000 crore
allocated for Short Term Cooperative Rural Credit is a good step as
co-operative societies reach the last mile.
Another welcome step is the allocation
of Rs 200 crore to promote 2,000 farmer producer organisations. This
essentially means promotion of existing and new farmer producer companies.
This new set of entities which number
more than 500 already are struggling for working capital and investment support
though they appear to be quite promising in the modern agribusiness context.
Mixed bag
Warehousing will get a boost with an
allocation of Rs. 5,000 crore . This is needed since there is a pathetic
shortage of storage facilities both for cereals and perishable produce and the
warehouse receipt system has not really made any headway so far despite its
extreme relevance for small holder agriculture.
The provision for financing 5 lakh
Joint Farming Groups of landless farmers who lease in land is a welcome move
too as these farmers who now cultivate more than 15 per cent of the land do not
have any facility to avail loans in the absence of land titles.
But, financing alone may not help as
seen in the Andhra Pradesh experience a few years ago when identity cards were
given to make such farmers eligible for loans. In any case, this large
provision will drive attention to the issue.
An unfortunate fact is that farmers
are vulnerable to high levels of production and market risk but no measures exist
to make crop insurance work or make markets deliver stable prices.
In this situation, the budget
provision of Rs.500 crore as a price stabilisation fund is highly inadequate.
There is no specific focus on the
problem of making agriculture in rainfed areas viable — by investing in soil
health, enhancing water retention capacity, identifying and producing locally
adapted seed suited for the specific rainfed area and so on. A scheme to
provide every farmer a soil health card in mission mode will be launched, for
which Rs. 100 crore has been provided and an
additional Rs. 56 crore to set up 100 Mobile Soil Testing Laboratories have
been allocated.
This is adopted from the Gujarat experience and is much needed but to be
effective, it requires participation of local agencies and institutions.
Disappointingly, there is just a very
modest Rs 100 crore allocation to a National Adaptation Fund to meet the
vagaries of climate change. Conserving genetic diversity to save valuable genes
that could build climate resilience and investment in breeding climate
resilient crops, would have buffered Indian agriculture against climate shocks.
However, there is a worthwhile
investment in the creation of a fund with a corpus of Rs. 10,000 crore for
providing equity through venture capital funds, quasi equity, soft loans and
other risk capital specially to encourage new start-ups in the MSME sector.
This can also be leveraged for agribusiness ventures to support farming and
farmers.
However, the Budget could have
acknowledged the reality of malnutrition and made an allocation.
The writers are with IIM, Ahmedabad
and Gene Campaign, respectively
(This article was published on August 13, 2014)
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/tokenism-wont-help-agriculture/article6313549.ece
Such A Nice Blog Thanks To Sharing Us Agra Online Florist
ReplyDelete